spoofer: (Default)
Xistentia: Mod ([personal profile] spoofer) wrote 2017-07-03 09:14 am (UTC)

Hello friend,

We're definitely thinking about these suggestions. If application volume grows much more, such as that we receive an excess of 20 apps in a round for example, we will be looking into app staff. However, for the time being, we'll be sticking with the current structure and procedure. We weighed the costs against benefits, considering such factors as: the estimated likelihood of future delays, extent of past delays, extent of player distress, team cohesion ("cooks in the kitchen," etc.), availability of TDM. We'll keep an eye out in the future if any of these variables change, and try to respond accordingly. We'll also be contacting the specific player whose app was read later to try to soothe any concerns and get/provide more information.

We're very aware that impatience makes people uncomfortable and that a lot of thoughts and concerns take place. It's really cool when people are so eager to see the musebox grow!! However, the week-long buffer at the current time exists with the intent of providing a common standard, with applications processed in the order they're submitted, and room to accommodate cruddy life events. It's our hope that cruddy life events remain far and few between and wait times are short and happy.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting